{"product_id":"2940046540710","title":"Refuting Anti-Milk Propaganda Why Dairy Products Are The Healthiest Foods For Most People","description":"\u003cp\u003ePeople who eat the most dairy products, and drink the most milk, have lower cancer, heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and 13% lower overall death rates.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWomen also have 15% lower breast cancer rates.\u003cbr\u003eWomen, who drink the most skim and non-fat milk, also have about half, 54%, as much PMS.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIf you cannot digest cows' milk then you might still be able to digest yoghurt or cheese.\u003cbr\u003eOr, goats' milk.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e.\u003cbr\u003eMETA-ANALYSES OF 300,000 TO 400,000 PEOPLE\u003cbr\u003eSHOW THAT PEOPLE WITH THE HIGHEST DAIRY CONSUMPTION HAVE A 13% LOWER OVERALL DEATH RATE\u003cbr\u003eAND 21% FEWER STROKES\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe Consumption of Milk and Dairy Foods and the Incidence of Vascular Disease and Diabetes: An Overview of the Evidence\u003cbr\u003ePeter C. Elwood, Janet E. Pickering, D. Ian Givens, and John E. Gallacher\u003cbr\u003eLipids. Oct 2010; 45(10): 925–939.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFrom Their Abstract:\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e“Meta-analyses suggest a reduction in risk in the subjects with the highest dairy consumption relative to those with the lowest intake:\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e0.87 (0.77, 0.98) for all-cause deaths,\u003cbr\u003e0.92 (0.80, 0.99) for ischaemic heart disease,\u003cbr\u003e0.79 (0.68, 0.91) for stroke\u003cbr\u003eand 0.85 (0.75, 0.96) for incident diabetes.”\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e.\u003cbr\u003eMETA-ANALYSES OF MORE THAN 1 MILLION WOMEN\u003cbr\u003eSHOW THAT WOMEN WITH THE HIGHEST TOTAL DAIRY INTAKE HAVE 15% LESS BREAST CANCER\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eBreast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 May;127(1):23-31. doi: 10.1007\/s10549-011-1467-5. Epub 2011 Mar 27.\u003cbr\u003eDairy consumption and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.\u003cbr\u003eDong JY1, Zhang L, He K, Qin LQ.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFrom Their Abstract:\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\"We identified 18 prospective cohort studies eligible for analysis, involving 24,187 cases and 1,063,471 participants.\u003cbr\u003eThe summary relative risk of breast cancer for the highest intake of total dairy food compared with the lowest was 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.76-0.95), with evidence of heterogeneity (P = 0.01, I (2) = 54.5%).\"\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\"For milk consumption, the summary relative risk was 0.91 (95% confidence interval: 0.80-1.02), and substantial heterogeneity was observed (P = 0.003, I (2) = 59.7%).\"\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e.\u003cbr\u003eSTUDY OF 2000 WOMEN\u003cbr\u003eSHOWS THAT WOMEN WHO DRINK THE MOST SKIM OR LOW-FAT MILK HAVE 54% AS MUCH PMS AS WOMEN WHO DRINK THE LEAST\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eCalcium and Vitamin D Intake and Risk of Incident Premenstrual Syndrome\u003cbr\u003eArch Intern Med. 2005;165:1246-1252\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePMS affects up to 85% to 90% of women.\u003cbr\u003eAnd, some women, “experience symptoms that meet the clinical definition of premenstrual syndrome (PMS), a disorder characterized by moderate to severe symptoms that substantially interfere with normal life activities and interpersonal relationships.”\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe Study involved 1057 women who developed PMS over 10 years of follow-up and 1968 women reporting no diagnosis of PMS.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eRESULTS: (Table 3).\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e“Participants consuming 4 servings or more per day of any type of milk had an RR of 0.68 compared with those reporting 1 serving or less per week.”\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e“Whole milk intake was associated with a modest increase in risk, while women who frequently consumed skim or low-fat milk had a significantly lower risk of developing PMS; the RR for women consuming 4 servings or more per day of skim or low-fat milk compared with those reporting 1 serving or less per week was 0.54.”\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e“The relationship between milk intake and risk of PMS did not vary by level of calcium or vitamin D supplementation.”\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e.\u003cbr\u003eVEGANS ALSO HAVE A 30% HIGHER BONE FRACTURE RATE THAN VEGETARIANS, FISH EATERS AND MEAT EATERS\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eComparative fracture risk in vegetarians and nonvegetarians in EPIC-Oxford.\u003cbr\u003eEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2007 December;61(12):1400-6. Epub 2007 Feb 7.\u003cbr\u003eAppleby P, Roddam A, Allen N, Key T.\u003cbr\u003eSource: Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe study, in the United Kingdom, involved 7947 men and 26,749 women aged 20-89 years.\u003cbr\u003e19,249 meat eaters, 4901 fish eaters, 9420 vegetarians and 1126 vegans.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eCompared with meat eaters, fracture incidence ratios were 1.01 for fish eaters, 1.00 for vegetarians and 1.30 for vegans.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFROM: http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/17299475\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Greg Dinneen","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47078700613872,"sku":"2940046540710","price":0.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0737\/7593\/9824\/files\/2940046540710_p0.jpg?v=1763694932","url":"https:\/\/shop-qa.barnesandnoble.com\/products\/2940046540710","provider":"Barnes \u0026 Noble (DEV)","version":"1.0","type":"link"}