{"product_id":"9781945421556","title":"Deposition Objections","description":"\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDeposition Objections\u003c\/strong\u003e \u003c\/em\u003egives you dozens of objections and tactics for confronting and resolving contentious deposition disputes. This edition adds new text, tips, and more than 100 cases to help you protect your witness and your case. Revisions and additions include:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eChapter 1 OBJECTING TO DEPOSITION NOTICES AND SUBPOENAS\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eProportionality (§1:80):\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eNew Federal Rule that all discovery must be “proportional to the needs of the case”\u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ul\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eChapter 8 FAMILY COMMUNICATIONS PRIVILEGES\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat Marital Interactions Are “Spousal Communications”? (§8:11):\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eException to privilege can extend to cases of abuse of any child in the home\u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDo the Privileges Apply to Same-Sex Marriages and Cohabitation? (§8:24):\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eExtension of privileges based on legalization of same-sex marriage in Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) and whether the privileges apply to pre-Obergefell communications\u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eChapter 10 PRIVACY PRIVILEGE\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003ePrivacy in the Age of Social Media (§10:04)\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDiscoverability of social-network system information (such as Facebook, Twitter, Linked In)\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe showing that a party must make in order to obtain information access to which is restricted by system user\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ul\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eChapter 14 LEGAL CONCLUSIONS\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003ePreparing Organization Representatives (§14:52):\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhat to do when the opposing party says that a representative’s answers are inadequate and demands a supplemental deposition\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhether contention questions are allowable in depositions of organization representatives whose answers will bind the organization\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ul\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eChapter 20 OBJECTIONS AT EXPERT WITNESS DEPOSITIONS\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAttorney Communications With Expert Witnesses: Privacy in the Age of Social Media (§20:03)\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003ePractical effect of 2010 amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which protect many attorney-expert communications from disclosure\u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eObjection: Opinion Testimony Standards and Applicable Legal Standards (§20:11)\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003ePractical effect of 2010 Federal Rules amendments on discoverability of bases of opinion testimony\u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDraft Materials and Draft Reports Generated by the Expert (§20:13)\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003ePractical effect of 2010 Federal Rules amendments on discoverability of materials prepared by expert\u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","brand":"LexisNexis","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47137348976880,"sku":"9781945421556","price":218.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0737\/7593\/9824\/files\/9781945421556_p0.jpg?v=1763795310","url":"https:\/\/shop-qa.barnesandnoble.com\/products\/9781945421556","provider":"Barnes \u0026 Noble (DEV)","version":"1.0","type":"link"}