1
/
of
1
ReadCycle
Economic and Social Returns on Investment in Open Archiving Publicly Funded Research Outputs
Economic and Social Returns on Investment in Open Archiving Publicly Funded Research Outputs
Regular price
$2.99 USD
Regular price
Sale price
$2.99 USD
Shipping calculated at checkout.
Quantity
Couldn't load pickup availability
Public funding of scientific, technical and medical (STM) research is undertaken with the
expectation that the economic and social returns to taxpayers will exceed the amount of the
research investment. Because discovery is a cumulative process, with new knowledge building
on earlier findings, the dissemination of research findings is crucial to ensuring that the returns
on the investment are realized.
Traditionally, journals have been one of the primary channels for research dissemination. With
the emergence of the Internet, it became possible to expand the sharing of research findings and
thus to better serve scientists as well as the “long tail” of other potential users – such as
educators and students, health clinicians and patients, businesses and the general public. It is
now technically feasible to put knowledge to use far beyond the limited universe served by
traditional toll-access or subscription journals. It is also possible for knowledge – research
articles and other research outputs – to be used and integrated in new ways that further advance
public purposes.
Responding to these opportunities, a growing number of public and private funders have
implemented policies mandating deposit of their funded research outputs in open online
archives, making it freely available to anyone with Internet access. While there is ample
anecdotal evidence of the benefits of such policies, the extent of the resulting leverage or its
relationship to costs has rarely been measured. As the availability of cost-benefit measures and
quantitative data would inform public policymaking, this project seeks to identify metrics for
demonstrating the return on investment in open access dissemination of publicly funded
research. We outline one possible approach and identify areas in which further data collection is
needed. This is intended to define and scope the data collection requirements and further model
developments necessary to produce a more robust estimate of the potential impacts of an
archiving mandate for publicly funded research outputs, such as the proposed Federal Research
Public Access Act (FRPAA).
The following sections outline the model and data sources used for preliminary estimates. These
estimates are based on the information available to us at the time of writing. They are released
in conjunction with an online model, which enables others to explore their own preferred values
for the various parameters. The model and this report can be found at
expectation that the economic and social returns to taxpayers will exceed the amount of the
research investment. Because discovery is a cumulative process, with new knowledge building
on earlier findings, the dissemination of research findings is crucial to ensuring that the returns
on the investment are realized.
Traditionally, journals have been one of the primary channels for research dissemination. With
the emergence of the Internet, it became possible to expand the sharing of research findings and
thus to better serve scientists as well as the “long tail” of other potential users – such as
educators and students, health clinicians and patients, businesses and the general public. It is
now technically feasible to put knowledge to use far beyond the limited universe served by
traditional toll-access or subscription journals. It is also possible for knowledge – research
articles and other research outputs – to be used and integrated in new ways that further advance
public purposes.
Responding to these opportunities, a growing number of public and private funders have
implemented policies mandating deposit of their funded research outputs in open online
archives, making it freely available to anyone with Internet access. While there is ample
anecdotal evidence of the benefits of such policies, the extent of the resulting leverage or its
relationship to costs has rarely been measured. As the availability of cost-benefit measures and
quantitative data would inform public policymaking, this project seeks to identify metrics for
demonstrating the return on investment in open access dissemination of publicly funded
research. We outline one possible approach and identify areas in which further data collection is
needed. This is intended to define and scope the data collection requirements and further model
developments necessary to produce a more robust estimate of the potential impacts of an
archiving mandate for publicly funded research outputs, such as the proposed Federal Research
Public Access Act (FRPAA).
The following sections outline the model and data sources used for preliminary estimates. These
estimates are based on the information available to us at the time of writing. They are released
in conjunction with an online model, which enables others to explore their own preferred values
for the various parameters. The model and this report can be found at
Share
