Falsified: Science vs. Darwin

In 1981, the 73rd General Assembly of the State of Arkansas voted in favor of Act 590, a bill requiring the “balanced treatment of creation-science and evolution.” The Bill was signed into law and quickly challenged in court. The resulting case, McLean V. Arkansas Board of Education, was heard before U.S. District Court Judge William R. Overton, whose judicial decision was entered on January 5, 1982 and found in favor of the plaintiffs. Based on expert testimony, Judge Overton noted that the 5 essential characteristics of science are: 1. It is guided by natural law; 2. It has to be explanatory by reference to natural law; 3. It is testable against the empirical world; 4. Its conclusions are tentative; and 5. It is falsifiable. Using these criteria, Judge Overton rejected the “scientific basis” for creation-science.

However, the same criteria were never applied to Darwin's unplanned evolution. Using the standard put forward by the scientific community and codified by Judge Overton, Falsified: Science vs. Darwin examines the unplanned origin of species and the unplanned origin of life. The book draws rational conclusions by referencing scientific literature and employing simple math. The ebook, Falsified, was abstracted from EVOLUTION NEEDS AN ADJECTIVE, which was published in 2010 and is available online.