Cato Supreme Court Review

Published every September, the Cato Supreme Court Review brings together leading legal scholars to analyze key cases from the Court’s most recent term and to preview the year ahead. Now in its 15th year, it is the only journal to critique the Court from a Madisonian perspective, grounded in the nation’s first principles: liberty and limited government.

Cases covered in the 2016-2017 edition include:

Salman v. United States
Murr v. Wisconsin
Expressions Hair Design
Lee v. Tam
Packingham
SW General
Trinity Lutheran
Nelson v. Colorado