History: Fiction or Science?: Chronology 1: Second Edition

Not quite what you have learned in school? This version of events is more substantiated by hard facts and logic - validated by new astronomical research and statistical analysis of ancient sources - than everything you have read and heard about history before. The so-called consensual history is a finely woven magic fabric of intricate lies about events predating the XVI century. There is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artefact that could be reliably and independently traced back earlier than the XI century. The archeological, dendrochronological, paleographical and carbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artefacts are both non-exact and contradictory.

The dominating historical discourse in its current state was essentially crafted in the XVI century from a rather contradictory jumble of sources, such as innumerable copies of ancient Latin and Greek manuscripts whose originals have vanished in the Dark Ages and the allegedly irrefutable proof delivered by the late mediaeval astronomers, all cemented by the power of the ecclesial authorities. Nearly all of its components are blatantly untrue!